Friday, August 30, 2013

BIG HUZZAHS for Missouri Law would Allow Arrest of Federal Agents Enforcing National Gun Laws

From: Charleston Voice
Subj: [Charleston Voice] BIG HUZZAHS for Missouri Law would Allow Arrest of Federal Agents Enforcing National Gun Laws

 
"Now, here's what I'm talkin' about!"  A big hat-tip to the citizens of Missouri and their elected legislature. A Big Boot to the solar plexus, however, for your Constitution-hating Governor Nixon. 

Nullification is THE PEOPLE'S WEAPON to roll back tyranny throughout this land peaceably and lawfully. Saving the 2nd Amendment is just the first step for states to restore our Republic.  The Show-Me State is showing Us, but can we See.  Agreed?

Missouri Law would Allow Arrest of Federal Agents Enforcing National Gun Laws


Friday, August 30, 2013
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqlD94BnmH5avZOmKuVHbYW3rQ-PEOW2ieBuHOkliJpKlLJRu0ZA0539ORRpDvESwWyKpnC91fcQhKypeQrIG968H3cZBYQKmPa9dp-EPQFrM6U8PA5_n36CsUZNnIEa1lg4xL5UNVBr0N/s1600/image001-734031.pngMissouri could soon become the last state that any federal agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) would want to work in. 

That’s because a bill adopted by the state legislature would, among other things, make it a crime for federal law enforcement officers to do their jobs within Missouri’s boundaries if it involves guns.

The legislation, which was vetoed by Governor Jay Nixon (D), but could still become law if lawmakers override the veto, seeks to nullify all federal gun laws in the state. It also states that federal agents who try to enforce said laws would be committing a felony.

Part of what’s become known as the “nullification movement,” the bill represents the most far-reaching attempt yet by conservatives to assert states’ rights over the federal government.

Nixon, who has signed other pro-gun measures, said in his veto statement that the federal government’s supremacy over the states’ “is as logically sound as it is legally well established.”

The governor also said he had problems with specific provisions in the bill, such as the part making it illegal to publish the name of any gun owner. Not only does this prohibition violate the First Amendment, Nixon said, but also it could curtail local newspapers’ tradition of publishing “photos of proud young Missourians who harvest their first turkey or deer.”

Another official concerned with the legislation is Richard G. Callahan, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. He says the law would make it impossible for joint law enforcement operations involving local, state and federal agents to work together to seize weapons from criminals.

All but one Republican in the Missouri House of Representatives voted for the bill. The lone GOP dissenter, Representative Jay Barnes, told The New York Times: “Our Constitution is not some cheap Chinese buffet where we get to pick the parts we like and ignore the rest.” He added, “Two centuries of constitutional jurisprudence shows that this bill is plainly unconstitutional, and I’m not going to violate my oath of office.”
-Noel Brinkerhoff

To Learn More:
Republican-Led State Governments Revive Pre-Civil War Nullification (by Aaron Wallechinsky and Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)




--
Posted By Charleston Voice to Charleston Voice at 8/30/2013 03:19:00 PM

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is great, BUT.. The gun confiscation is to be done by foreign troops, as well as perhaps by Americans. There are a huge number of foreign troops already on US soil, training for door to door search and seizures and a multipilicity of other unlawful actions against Americans. When activated, these may be attired in swat uniforms, US military uniforms, and/or police uniforms. How, then will this law in Missouri be applicable as most likely the ATF will NOT be involved directly door to door. County sheriffs in each state should have already determined they are NOT going to allow the foreigners to trespass in their jurisdictions. Sheriffs should be organizing and PREPARING NOW with local citizenry to defend our 2nd Amendment rights. It is UP TO THE PEOPLE in this nation to defend and protect their rights, and NO UNLAWFUL PRIVATE CORPORATION OPERATING IN THE DISTRICT OF CRIMINALS HAS ANY AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER OVER A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN NOR OVER THE SHERIFF - PERIOD. The criminal 'laws' apply ONLY TO THOSE IN WASH DC and NOT to the American citizenry. Attempts to confiscate our weapons amounts to high treason and UNLAWFUL INVASION OF SOVEREIGN TERRITORY - much like they have committed in Lybia, Egypt, Iraq and now Syria - but this time it will be on OUR SOIL. We are going to die one way or the other. Will we go down as yellow bellies, rounded up and gassed in the chambers like they did to the people in Germany, Iraq and now Syria? Or will we die as patriots defending our families, friends and our original organic Constitution? Each must decide. If I go down, it won't be in vain. I will take down with me every traitor and enemy of this nation that I can possibly take with me. What say YOU?

Anonymous said...

THE AHOS HAVE YET TO FIGURE OUT WE OUT NUMBER THEM HUNDREDS TO ONE. THEY CANNOT WEAR ENOUGH BODY ARMOR GOING HOUSE TO HOUSE TO STOP A 30-06 220 GR.... THERE ARE LITERALLY THOUSANDS OF HOUSES AND THEY COULD NEVER GET ALL THE FOLKS GUNS..... IF THEY THINK WE WILL SIT AROUND WAITING UNTIL THE DOOR BELL RINGS GOOD LUCK.... 365,000 FORIEGN TROOPS SPREAD OUT OVER THIS NATION WOULD BE LIKE PEEING ON A FORREST FIRE..... I AM NOT SAYING CITZENS WON'T GET KILLED, BUT THE FORIEGNERS WILL GET SLAUGHTERED....ALSO THE TROOPS ABROAD WILL COME BACK BY PLANE AS SOON AS THEY HEAR THIS IS HAPPENING.... WE NEED TO GO ARREST OBOZO ........N O W !!!!!!!!!!!!! I WOULD HATE TO BE A MILITARY LEADER THAT TRIES TO STOP OUR TROOPS IF THEY DECIDE TO COME TO OUR RESCUE.... I DO KNOW SOME MARINES STATE SIDE, AND THE TROOPS KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON .....I HAVE BEEN TOLD THE WILL KEEP THEIR OATH.